Trump 'not happy' about border security deal | Free Press from USA

Trump ‘not happy’ about border security deal

Trump 'not happy' about border security deal

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump slammed a tentative border security agreement reached by congressional negotiators looking to avert another government shutdown, but he did not say whether he would sign the legislation if it reaches his desk.

Speaking to reporters during a White House cabinet meeting, Trump said Tuesday he was dissatisfied with the deal, which was announced late Monday by a bipartisan group of budget negotiators.

“Am I happy? The answer is no, I’m not,” he said. “I’m not happy.”

While Trump said he is “thrilled” with the direction negotiations are going, the tentative deal is “not doing the trick.”

Still, Trump expressed hope that another government shutdown would be avoided.

“I don’t think you’re going to see a shutdown,” he said.

On Capitol Hill, meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said the Senate could vote “in short order” on the tentative proposal.

McConnell, R-Ky., said during a speech on the Senate floor that negotiations “were able to move forward productively” after Democrats moved off their position that Congress shouldn’t spend “one dollar” on new border barriers and dropped their demand for a hard cap on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainees.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said the agreement represents “a path forward for our country” and would help avoid “another round of fraught negotiations” as lawmakers rush to beat a fast-approaching deadline.

More: In government shutdown aftermath, federal workers still hurting, survey finds

More: Can the middle-class revival under Trump last?

To avoid another government shutdown, Congress must pass the deal and Trump must sign it by midnight Friday, when existing funding will expire.

Trump, in his remarks at the White House, said he would be “adding things” to the agreement, but it wasn’t clear whether the bipartisan group of lawmakers that negotiated the deal would agree to any changes.

The deal, announced late Monday as Trump was about to take the stage at a political rally in El Paso, Texas, includes $1.375 billion for a structure along the southern border – well below the $5.7 billion Trump has demanded for the wall that he made a central promise of his 2016 presidential campaign.

More: President Trump, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo to talk taxes Tuesday

More: Government shutdown stymied frozen tax refunds, tied up IRS phone lines, report shows

Democrats sought to limit the number of detention slots, or “beds,” that ICE could have at its disposal to detain immigrants in the country illegally who were apprehended within the nation’s interior. Democrats had originally hoped to cap that number at 16,500. The White House rejected that proposal and Trump repeatedly slammed it publicly. 

Instead, Democrats have agreed to no cap on detention slots for immigrants captured within the country. The deal would include enough funding to cover 40,520 beds overall, a number that includes detentions for interior arrests as well as immigrants who are caught at the border. If Democrats had capped interior slots at 16,500, the overall number of beds available to ICE would have been about 35,000.

But both sides acknowledged that the agency has routinely exceeded limits imposed by Congress, and would likely continue to do so.

The agreement already is under fire from conservatives, who have been urging Trump not to abandon his push for $5.7 billion in border wall funding.

Conservative commentator Ann Coulter blasted the tentative deal on Twitter, writing that Trump “talks a good game on the border wall but it’s increasingly clear he’s afraid to fight for it.” Opposition from Coulter and other high-profile conservatives was widely viewed as influencing Trump to reject another bipartisan agreement late last year, a move that led to the last government shutdown.

Contributing: John Fritze and Alan Gomez

More: Lawmakers don’t want any more government shutdowns; they just can’t agree on how to prevent them


Source link